State v. Sampson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding corroboration sufficient when car description and location — but not intoxication — confirmed
• although anonymous, a reasonable inference showed that informant was an employee of a doughnut shop
• although anonymous, a reasonable inference showed that informant was an employee of a doughnut shop
• anonymous tip of “possible drunk-driver,” together with vehicle description, provided reasonable suspicion sufficient to support investigatory stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Wells
  California Supreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 132×
• United States v. Wade Allen Wheat
  Eighth Circuit· 2001-12-28· cited 122×
• State v. Contreras
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-09-12· cited 76×
• McChesney v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1999-10-20· cited 75×
• State v. Slater
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1999-07-09· cited 74×
• State v. Boyea
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-12-01· cited 69×
• Kaysville City v. Mulcahy
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1997-07-10· cited 56×
• State v. Lafond
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2002-07-31· cited 24×
• State v. McDonald
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2010-10-19· cited 9×
• State v. Lux
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1999-09-16· cited 8×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• State v. Caron
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1987-12-24· cited 52×
• State v. Dulac
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1992-01-03· cited 35×
• State v. Dube
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-03-01· cited 32×
• State v. Nelson
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-03-10· cited 25×
• State v. Blais
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1980-07-09· cited 24×