Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/31/1985
State v. Singleton
Citations
- 326 S.E.2d 153
- 284 S.C. 388
- 1985 S.C. LEXIS 322
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- instruction proper where judge states the jury may consider \any mitigating circumstances ... which are supported by evidence.\
- instruction proper where judge states the jury may consider “any mitigating circumstances ... which are supported by evidence.”
- no error for solicitor to respond in kind to defense counsel's argument
- no error for solicitor to respond in kind to defense counsel’s argument
- references to appellant’s prior crimes were vague
- references to appellant's prior crimes were vague
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harwell, Littlejohn, Ness, Gregory, Chandler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-20· cited 352×
- Brogdon v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 220×
- State v. CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-04-05· cited 157×
- State v. BellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-02-26· cited 81×
- State v. HugheySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-27· cited 68×
- Singleton v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-08-30· cited 49×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-01-06· cited 47×
- State v. PatrickSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-06-09· cited 42×
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-11-27· cited 26×
- Rosemond v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-06-29· cited 25×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-08-14· cited 24×
- State v. EaslerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-05-13· cited 23×
- State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 23×
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-12-15· cited 23×
- State v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-04-17· cited 20×
- Dial Ex Rel. Estate of Dial v. Niggel Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-11-30· cited 18×
- State v. CainSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-10-24· cited 16×
- State v. ElmoreSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-05-16· cited 5×
- Hyman v. AikenD. South Carolina· 1985-03-31· cited 3×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- California v. PrysockSupreme Court· 1981-06-29· cited 537×
- Stewart v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1983-04-18· cited 179×
- State v. CopelandSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-11-10· cited 134×
- State v. ElmoreSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-11-01· cited 77×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-01-07· cited 68×
- State v. SpannSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-10-13· cited 41×
- Leverton v. WatersTennessee Supreme Court· 1869-09-15· cited 24×
- State v. MoultrieSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-10-22· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.