Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/24/1988

State v. Cain

Citations

377 S.E.2d 556
297 S.C. 497
1988 S.C. LEXIS 147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding testimony was not material in light of physical evidence offered at trial, including laboratory tests, bodies found, the crime scene and the pathologist's testimony
referring to laboratory tests, bodies found, the crime scene, and the pathologist's testimony
“The ‘send a message’ argument here certainly did not rise to the level of arousing juror passion or prejudice.”
“The ‘send a message’ argument here certainly did not rise to the level of arousing juror passion or prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harwell, Ness, Gregory, Chandler, Finney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.