Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/15/1986
State v. Matthews
Citations
- 353 S.E.2d 444
- 291 S.C. 339
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the decision to award funds to capital defendants is a matter within the trial court’s discretion
- The method and scope of voir dire are matters largely within the discretion of the trial court.
- The method and scope of voir dire are matters largely within the discretion of the trial court.
- \An exemption under [S.C.Code Ann. § 14-7-850] is a privilege and not a disqualification.\
- “An exemption under [S.C.Code Ann. § 14-7-850] is a privilege and not a disqualification.”
- “An exemption under [S.C.Code Ann. § 14-7-850] is a privilege and not a disqualification.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Matthews v. EvattFourth Circuit· 1997-01-28· cited 234×
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-03-19· cited 89×
- State v. HugheySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-27· cited 68×
- State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-02-05· cited 55×
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 51×
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-10-24· cited 40×
- State v. MercerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-01-12· cited 36×
- State v. PowersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-08· cited 25×
- State v. BurtonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-10-08· cited 23×
- People v. UrrutiaColorado Court of Appeals· 1994-09-22· cited 23×
- State v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-07-02· cited 22×
- Norris v. FerreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-06-07· cited 9×
- Dunn v. Charleston Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-03-25· cited 6×
- Chaffee v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-11-30· cited 4×
- Thames v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-12-02· cited 1×
- State v. BlurtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-08-07· cited 1×
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. SampsonSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 1997-03-10· cited 1×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Adams v. TexasSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 1,718×
- Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court· 1986-05-05· cited 1,649×
- Skipper v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1986-04-29· cited 1,534×
- Sireci v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-05-17· cited 162×
- Graham v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-07-31· cited 88×
- Commonwealth v. GolstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-08-26· cited 75×
- State v. TynerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-08-23· cited 69×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-01-07· cited 68×
- State v. MiddletonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-01-29· cited 63×
- State v. GilbertSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-09-14· cited 54×
- Stone v. BetheaSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1968-04-29· cited 51×
- State v. YatesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-12-22· cited 50×
- State v. KoonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-12-20· cited 50×
- State v. SmartSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-11-23· cited 47×
- State v. SpannSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-10-13· cited 41×
- State v. HymanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-07-22· cited 40×
- State v. FierroArizona Supreme Court· 1979-10-22· cited 40×
- State v. GulledgeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-02-16· cited 32×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-10-10· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.