Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 5/31/1994

State v. Sims

Citations

  • 881 P.2d 840
  • 239 Utah Adv. Rep. 60
  • 1994 Utah LEXIS 39
  • 1994 WL 236990

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding case moot where ruling on constitutional question would have no legal effect on the parties
  • holding case moot where ruling on constitutional question would have no legal effect on the parties
  • dismissing a case for lack of jurisdiction because even if the court granted the relief requested \it would have no legal effect on the parties\
  • \An issue on appeal is considered moot when the requested judicial relief cannot affect the rights of the litigants.\ (internal quotation marks omitted
  • “An issue on appeal is considered moot when the requested judicial relief cannot affect the rights of the litigants.” (citation and quotation omitted)
  • “An issue on appeal is considered moot when the requested judicial relief cannot affect the rights of the litigants.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bench, Durham, Hall, Howe, Stewart, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.