Neztsosie v. Meyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court’s denial of leave to amend because the motion was filed after the district court had already granted summary judgment, the litigation had been ongoing for three years, and the plaintiffs “knew or should have known of the [additional] claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).