Jacobsen v. Jacobsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• res judicata bars all issues which the party had a fair opportunity to present and have determined in another proceeding
• “ ‘In the absence of [a showing of substantial change of circumstances], the [divorce] decree shall not be modified and the matters previously litigated and incorporated therein cannot be collaterally attacked in face of the doctrine of res judicata.’” (citation omitted)
• “‘When there has been an adjudication, it becomes res judicata as to those issues which were either tried and determined, or upon all issues which the party had a fair opportunity to present and have determined in the other proceeding.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Throckmorton v. Throckmorton
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1988-12-19· cited 33×
• State v. Sims
  Utah Supreme Court· 1994-05-31· cited 31×
• Toone v. Toone
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1998-01-29· cited 12×
• Krambule v. Krambule
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1999-12-09· cited 12×
• Schoney v. Memorial Estates, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1993-10-25· cited 10×
• D'Aston v. Aston
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1992-12-02· cited 10×
• Nelson v. Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2023-04-13· cited 2×
• Provo River Water Users' Ass'n v. Morgan
  Utah Supreme Court· 1993-07-27· cited 1×
• Raser Technologies v. Merrill Lynch
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2022-02-17· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kessimakis v. Kessimakis
  Utah Supreme Court· 1978-06-02· cited 14×
• Mendenhall v. Kingston
  Utah Supreme Court· 1980-04-10· cited 9×