Duran v. Morris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an administrative segregation decision \entail[s] no collateral legal consequences of the kind that result from a criminal conviction\
• explaining that when there is a possibility that collateral consequences will be imposed as a result of a challenged conviction, a challenge to that conviction is not moot
• holding moot prisoner’s challenge to administrative treatment to which he was no longer subject but acknowledging as “clearly established” that claim challenging conviction is never moot unless it can be shown there will no be adverse collateral consequences
• holding moot prisoner’s challenge to administrative treatment to which he was no longer subject but acknowledging as “clearly established” that claim challenging conviction is never moot unless it can be shown there will no be adverse collateral consequences
• \Intraprison administrative decisions such as the one before us entail no collateral legal consequences of the kind that result from a criminal conviction.\
• habeas corpus petition for unconstitutional administrative segregation moot where prisoner released from segregation with no undue effects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).