Skip to main content

State v. Simpson

Citations

  • 173 P.3d 1027
  • 217 Ariz. 326
  • 519 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 11
  • 2007 Ariz. App. LEXIS 232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the statute governing child molestation did not require the state to prove the act was motivated by sexual intent
  • interpreting lack of sexual motivation as affirmative defense and concluding such motivation not described as element of statutory offense
  • reaffirming the allocation of the burden of proof under § 13-1410 and § 13- 1407(E)
  • “Trial courts are required to follow the decisions of a higher court....”
  • defendant has burden of proving defense by preponderance of evidence
  • describing 1993 amendment as significant departure from previous language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orozco, Barker, Timmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.