Court of Appeals of Arizona· 7/29/1993
State v. Sandoval
Citations
- 857 P.2d 395
- 175 Ariz. 343
- 144 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 37
- 1993 Ariz. App. LEXIS 141
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the statute governing indecent exposure did not require a showing that defendant was motivated by sexual intent
- abuse of discretion is “discretion manifestly unreasonable or exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons”
- “The fact that the [victims] were scared by defendant's conduct itself provides some evidence that a reasonable person would be alarmed by such conduct.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grant, Jacobson, Weisberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-11-30· cited 90×
- State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles HolleArizona Supreme Court· 2016-09-13· cited 57×
- Norgord v. State Ex Rel. BerningCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-09-11· cited 35×
- State v. LemmingCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-05-07· cited 18×
- State v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-12-18· cited 18×
- State v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-08-28· cited 14×
- State v. MedinaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-05-07· cited 13×
- State v. MalvernCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-04-09· cited 11×
- Miller v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-05-29· cited 11×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-03-13· cited 6×
- State of Arizona v. Joshua Paul Eugene HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-08-28
- State of Arizona v. Jay David Ramsey, Sr.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-11-30
- Batty v. Az Medical BrdCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2022-05-10
- State of Iowa v. Christopher James WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2024-04-19
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Quigley v. City Court of the City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-03-31· cited 63×
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court· 1988-02-25· cited 61×
- Members of the Board of Education of the Pearce Union High School District v. LeslieArizona Supreme Court· 1975-12-02· cited 28×
- State v. GatesArizona Supreme Court· 1978-03-02· cited 27×
- State v. MiniefieldArizona Supreme Court· 1974-05-15· cited 24×
- State v. BouchierCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-01-12· cited 22×
- Bowman v. HallArizona Supreme Court· 1957-09-30· cited 21×
- Smith v. Pima County Law Enforcement CouncilArizona Supreme Court· 1976-04-27· cited 20×
- Attwood v. PurcellD. Arizona· 1975-09-08· cited 20×
- State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1981-02-17· cited 15×
- State v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-02-15· cited 15×
- City Court of City of Tucson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-02-29· cited 12×
- Rolph v. City Court of City of MesaArizona Supreme Court· 1980-10-14· cited 12×
- State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1981-10-16· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.