Arizona Supreme Court· 10/22/1998
State v. Lujan
Citations
- 967 P.2d 123
- 192 Ariz. 448
- 281 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 6
- 1998 Ariz. LEXIS 636
- 1998 WL 736359
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting A.R.S. § 13-1407.E (Supp.2006), 2 which states “[i]t is a defense to prosecution pursuant to § ... 13-1410 that the defendant was not motivated by a sexual interest.”
- addressing pre-1993, former § 13- 8 STATE V. HOLLE Opinion of the Court 1410 and, although citing § 13-1407(E), stating in dicta: “‘Knowingly molests’ not only requires that the defendant touch a child’s private parts but that the defendant be motivated by a sexual interest.”
- defendant can call expert to testify generally about why victim of child molestation may fabricate accusations
- prior sexual abuse evidence admissible when offered by defendant “to show motive, propensity, or ability to imagine or fabricate” and not to impugn or cast doubt on victim’s moral character
- when facts of case raise questions of credibility or accuracy that might not be explained by experiences common to jurors — like reactions of child victims of sexual abuse — expert testimony on general behavioral characteristics of such victims should be admitted
- “When the facts of the case raise questions of credibility or accuracy that might not be explained by experiences common to jurors—like the reactions of child victims of sexual abuse—expert testimony on the general behavioral characteristics of such victims should be admitted.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feldman, Zlaket, Jones, Martone, McGregor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Arizona v. Martin David Salazar-MercadoArizona Supreme Court· 2014-05-29· cited 80×
- State v. RolonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-07-31· cited 69×
- State v. WeaverlingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-10-25· cited 60×
- State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles HolleArizona Supreme Court· 2016-09-13· cited 57×
- State v. PackedSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-07-18· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. PolkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-04-13· cited 36×
- State of Arizona v. Richard Portugal OrtizCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-10-16· cited 31×
- In Re James P.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-03-01· cited 19×
- State v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-12-18· cited 18×
- Cv-12-0319-Pr State of Arizona v. Joseph CoopermanArizona Supreme Court· 2013-08-05· cited 13×
- State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles HolleCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-09-16· cited 10×
- Pierson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2012-06-18· cited 10×
- State v. FaufataHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2003-03-04· cited 5×
- State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-07-15· cited 2×
- State of Arizona v. Frank Joseph SarulloCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-11-13
- Bieganski v. ShinnNinth Circuit· 2025-08-12
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Olden v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1988-12-12· cited 592×
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-11· cited 423×
- State v. MoranArizona Supreme Court· 1986-11-19· cited 189×
- State v. LindseyArizona Supreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 175×
- State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1976-02-02· cited 90×
- State v. OliverArizona Supreme Court· 1988-08-04· cited 79×
- State v. CastroCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-11-24· cited 26×
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-121430Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-10-08· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.