Arizona Supreme Court· 1/7/1992
State v. Reynolds
Citations
- 823 P.2d 681
- 170 Ariz. 233
- 104 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 6
- 1992 Ariz. LEXIS 8
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “If a statute’s language is clear and unambiguous, the court will give it effect without resorting to other rules of statutory construction.”
- legislature could have specifically provided that time spent in a drug rehabilitation center would be credit towards a prisoner’s jail sentence, but did not
- statutory interpretation requires court to discern legislative intent
- statutory interpretation requires court to discern legislative intent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Moeller, Corcoran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court· 1994-04-21· cited 294×
- State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court· 1997-07-15· cited 72×
- State v. CidCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-03-23· cited 67×
- State v. MilkeArizona Supreme Court· 1993-12-21· cited 55×
- State v. FellhauerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-06-04· cited 35×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-03-10· cited 35×
- Beecroft v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1994-05-16· cited 35×
- State v. CarnegieCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-04-13· cited 35×
- State v. PetrakCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-09-11· cited 31×
- Matter of Guardianship/Conservatorship of DentonArizona Supreme Court· 1997-09-25· cited 25×
- State Ex Rel. Udall v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-06-13· cited 25×
- State v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-05-16· cited 23×
- Cutter Aviation, Inc. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-05-22· cited 22×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-04-16· cited 21×
- Sierra Tucson, Inc. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-03-31· cited 20×
- State v. HoggattCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-02-13· cited 19×
- State v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-12-18· cited 18×
- State of Arizona v. Joann BonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-11-28· cited 18×
- Pfeil v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-07-13· cited 17×
- Tobel v. State, Dept. of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-06-10· cited 17×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court· 1991-04-05· cited 196×
- State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court· 1990-10-04· cited 120×
- Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-01-10· cited 73×
- Lock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-04-11· cited 47×
- People v. RodgersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-03-22· cited 40×
- Commonwealth v. CozzoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-06-11· cited 37×
- People v. StangeMichigan Court of Appeals· 1979-08-06· cited 32×
- State v. BabcockSupreme Court of Kansas· 1979-07-14· cited 31×
- State v. RitchCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-05-09· cited 30×
- Grant v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1983-03-10· cited 15×
- State v. CereceresCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-03-29· cited 13×
- People v. RadarColorado Court of Appeals· 1982-04-29· cited 12×
- State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-12-31· cited 8×
- Burton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-12-18· cited 6×
- State v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-01-15· cited 5×
- Staggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1986-04-17· cited 5×
- State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-02-26· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.