State v. Shoemaker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating an indictment phrased substantially in the language of the statute which creates and defines the offense is ordinarily sufficient
• indictment phrased substantially in language of statute which creates and defines offense is ordinarily sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Curtis
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-01-05· cited 54×
• State v. Beam
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-06-01· cited 28×
• State v. Wade
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-10-07· cited 25×
• State v. Guthrie
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-10-28· cited 22×
• State v. Wilkes
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-03-17· cited 20×
• State v. Reddick
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-19· cited 19×
• State v. Dudley
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-14· cited 17×
• State v. Means
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-02-06· cited 16×
• State v. Smalls
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-06-28· cited 12×
• Koon v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-04-05· cited 11×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-07-30· cited 10×
• State v. Wilkes
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-06-11· cited 6×
• State v. Barnett
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-03-08· cited 5×
• State v. Gonzales
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-07-06· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Crenshaw
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-04-09· cited 40×
• State v. Tabory
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-02-11· cited 23×
• State v. Duncan
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-03-19· cited 6×