Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2/11/1974
State v. Tabory
Citations
- 202 S.E.2d 852
- 262 S.C. 136
- 1974 S.C. LEXIS 279
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the State \may not support a conviction for an offense intended to be charged by relying upon a caption to the exclusion of the language contained in the body of the indictment\
- holding the State may not support a conviction for an offense intended to be charged by relying upon a caption to the exclusion of the language contained in the body of the indictment
- indictment phrased substantially in language of statute which creates and defines offense charged is ordinarily sufficient
- “the State may not support a conviction for an offense intended to be charged by relying upon a caption to the exclusion of the language contained in the body of the indictment”
- \[T]he State may not support a conviction for an offense intended to be charged by relying upon a caption to the exclusion of the language contained in the body of the indictment.\
- offense intended to be charged must be described with sufficient particularity that conviction or acquittal thereupon may be pleaded in bar to any subsequent prosecution; indictment phrased substantially in language of statute which creates and defines offense is ordinarily sufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Littlejohn, Moss, Lewis, Bussey, Brailsford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-03-12· cited 71×
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-02-22· cited 49×
- State v. MunnSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-06-22· cited 43×
- State v. TumblestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-11-27· cited 31×
- State v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-03-04· cited 22×
- State v. ErvinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-11-16· cited 22×
- State v. GrampusSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-04-14· cited 20×
- State v. WilkesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-03-17· cited 20×
- State v. ReddickCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-19· cited 19×
- State v. MeansSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-02-06· cited 16×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-07-30· cited 10×
- In re Corey B.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-01-12· cited 7×
- State v. WilkesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-06-11· cited 6×
- State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-03-08· cited 5×
- State v. McCloudCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-04-14· cited 4×
- Fewell v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-06-08· cited 2×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.