Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/7/1991
State v. Wade
Citations
- 409 S.E.2d 780
- 306 S.C. 79
- 1991 S.C. LEXIS 211
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting dissents attempt to include evidence presented at trial as surrounding circumstances available for consideration in evaluating sufficiency of an indictment
- the State should “not be allowed to prove a different date, than that set forth in the indictment ... unless the defendant is held to have had knowledge that the State would attempt to prove a different date upon trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Gregory, Harwell, Chandler, Finney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-07-03· cited 146×
- State v. BaldonadoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-02-05· cited 51×
- State v. TumblestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-11-27· cited 31×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-03-25· cited 20×
- State v. ReddickCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-19· cited 19×
- Riggins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2005-06-06· cited 19×
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-02-11· cited 16×
- People v. AlbarranAppellate Court of Illinois· 2019-02-14· cited 14×
- State v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-12-05· cited 9×
- State v. McCloudCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-04-14· cited 4×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Covington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-07-26· cited 96×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-10-06· cited 90×
- State v. SwallowSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-06-13· cited 65×
- State v. MunnSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-06-22· cited 43×
- State v. CrenshawSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-04-09· cited 40×
- State v. PierceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-08-08· cited 38×
- State in Interest of KAWSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-10-20· cited 30×
- State v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court· 1980-04-23· cited 27×
- People v. FrittsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-08-01· cited 23×
- State v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-03-04· cited 22×
- State v. BirdSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-04-11· cited 20×
- State v. WonserSupreme Court of Kansas· 1975-06-14· cited 18×
- Waitt v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1966-06-13· cited 18×
- State v. RutledgeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1957-12-31· cited 17×
- State v. HamSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-07-17· cited 16×
- State v. QuarlesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-11-06· cited 8×
- State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-06-16· cited 8×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1886-02-22· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.