Skip to main content
· 1/28/2009

Osborne v. Williams

Citations

  • 201 P.3d 278
  • 225 Or. App. 431
  • 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing SPO where contents of some contacts contained “sexual solicitations,” but no threat of harm, and, thus, were not sufficient to cause petitioners reasonable apprehension regarding their personal safety
  • Conspiracy is a “theory of mutual agency under which a conspirator becomes jointly liable for the tortious conduct of his or her coconspirators.”
  • “Because civil conspiracy is not a separate cause of action, Holloway’s claims should be dismissed with prejudice.”
  • internal citations and quotation 838 Reed v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp. marks omitted
  • a civil conspiracy requires evidence of two or more persons, an object to be accomplished, a meeting of the minds on the object or course of action, one or more unlawful overt acts, and damages as the proximate result thereof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Rosenblum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.