Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/23/2008
Sparks v. Deveny
Citations
- 189 P.3d 1268
- 221 Or. App. 283
- 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1081
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- causing a telephone to ring is a nonexpressive contact and can serve as a predicate contact if it satisfies the requirements of ORS 30.866(1)
- considering whether the circumstances surrounding the contact give rise to con- cern
- respondent’s “hang-up” calls could not serve as predicate contacts for an SPO because they would not have caused petitioner reasonable personal safety concerns
- in the absence of any threatening behavior, the respondent’s continued attendance at the petitioner’s exercise class, even after being told to stop, would not cause a reasonable person apprehension for her personal safety
- in the absence of any threatening behavior, the respondent’s continued attendance at the petitioner’s exercise class, even after being told to stop, and following the petitioner in his car would not cause a reasonable person apprehension for her personal safety
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Wollheim, Sercombe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Braude v. BraudeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-05-16· cited 19×
- King v. W. T. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-18· cited 19×
- Falkenstein v. FalkensteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-07-28· cited 8×
- D. O. v. RicheyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-12-04· cited 8×
- Miley v. MileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-13· cited 6×
- Roth v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-07-22· cited 3×
- C. P. v. MittelbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-06-10· cited 3×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court· 1999-02-26· cited 185×
- Delgado v. SoudersOregon Supreme Court· 2002-05-16· cited 82×
- Hanzo v. dePARRIECourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-02-18· cited 51×
- Habrat v. MilliganCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-09-27· cited 39×
- Weatherly v. WilkieCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-08-02· cited 27×
- State v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-10-30· cited 21×
- Castro v. HeinzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-06-23· cited 12×
- Edwards v. BiehlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-12-14· cited 10×
- Magyar v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-02-14· cited 3×
- Middleton v. TullyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-02-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.