Skip to main content

State v. Shaw

Citations

  • 542 A.2d 1106
  • 149 Vt. 275
  • 1987 Vt. LEXIS 617

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding statements that occurred two or three hours after sexual assault were excited utterances because declarant’s hysterical condition was caused by assault
  • holding court did not abuse discretion in admitting testimony from friends of sexual assault complainant that her behavior and personality changed after assault where defendant claimed testimony was too remote to be relevant
  • noting presumption that jury abides by the instructions of the trial court
  • victim’s friends testimony comparing the victim’s behavior before and after the date of the rape was material to whether the rape occurred
  • “[C]ontemporaneousness with the exciting event is not required for statements to be admissible as excited utterances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, C.J., Peck, J., and Barney, C.J. (Ret.), Keyser, J. (Ret.) and Costello, District Judge (Ret.), Specially Assigned

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.