Skip to main content

Parker v. State

Citations

  • 846 A.2d 485
  • 156 Md. App. 252
  • 2004 Md. App. LEXIS 37

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “the purpose of the exception in Maryland is to corroborate the victim’s testimony, and not simply to ‘combat stereotypes held by jurors regarding nonreporting victims.’ ” (quoting and contrasting Maryland law with State v. Samuels, 75 Conn.App. 671, 684, 817 A.2d 719 (2003
  • jury could legitimately infer that victim’s behavior changed due to rape from the fact that “abrupt behavioral change[s] occurred closely on the heels of the rape”
  • jury could legitimately infer that victim's behavior changed due to rape from the fact that \abrupt behavioral change[s] occurred closely on the heels of the rape\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Salmon, Barbera, Sharer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.