Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 4/8/2004
Parker v. State
Citations
- 846 A.2d 485
- 156 Md. App. 252
- 2004 Md. App. LEXIS 37
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “the purpose of the exception in Maryland is to corroborate the victim’s testimony, and not simply to ‘combat stereotypes held by jurors regarding nonreporting victims.’ ” (quoting and contrasting Maryland law with State v. Samuels, 75 Conn.App. 671, 684, 817 A.2d 719 (2003
- jury could legitimately infer that victim’s behavior changed due to rape from the fact that “abrupt behavioral change[s] occurred closely on the heels of the rape”
- jury could legitimately infer that victim's behavior changed due to rape from the fact that \abrupt behavioral change[s] occurred closely on the heels of the rape\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Salmon, Barbera, Sharer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dickerson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2005-10-20· cited 72×
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-08-26· cited 26×
- Garibay v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-07-25· cited 9×
- Choate v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-09· cited 8×
- Muhammad v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-05-29· cited 6×
- Rosov v. Maryland State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-07-06· cited 4×
- Barksdale v. WilkowskyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-07· cited 4×
- Gaerian v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-10-28· cited 4×
- Para v. 1691 Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-01· cited 4×
- Vigna v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-07-31· cited 3×
- Gordon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-03-30· cited 1×
- In re: J.H.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-04-29· cited 1×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
- State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-06-11· cited 159×
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-02-04· cited 119×
- Breeding v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-06-08· cited 99×
- Whittlesey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-09-28· cited 96×
- Bedford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-11-29· cited 77×
- State v. AllewaltCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-25· cited 71×
- Cassidy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-02-03· cited 69×
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-03-31· cited 68×
- Wilson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2000-02-24· cited 57×
- Simmons v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-03-02· cited 56×
- Snyder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-11-16· cited 56×
- Ali v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-12-07· cited 56×
- State v. BishopSupreme Court of Kansas· 1987-02-20· cited 46×
- Ely v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-07-10· cited 43×
- State v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-11-18· cited 43×
- Street v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-01-15· cited 40×
- State v. CoseyCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-04-21· cited 39×
- Jeffries v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-01-29· cited 36×
- Nitz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-06-06· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.