Skip to main content
· 5/16/1986

Poulin v. Ford Motor Co.

Citations

  • 513 A.2d 1168
  • 147 Vt. 120
  • 1986 Vt. LEXIS 381

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]he issue is whether the plaintiff bought the car to resell in the ordinary course of his business.”
  • “The purpose of our > Although “[t]he group pleading doctrine [was] developed in consequence of the rigors of Rule 9(b
  • issues not objected to at trial will not be considered upon appellate review
  • statute refers courts to FTC decisions for definition of the term deceptive
  • statute refers courts to FTC decisions for definition of the term deceptive
  • “The purpose of our Consumer Fraud Act is to protect consumers by adding a claim for relief that is easier to establish than is common law fraud. To require the higher degree of proof would frustrate the legislative intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Peck, Gibson, Hayes, Barney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.