State v. Connarn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no abuse of discretion where trial court gave defendant opportunity to depose witness not disclosed by State
• “The identity of the specimen need not be proved beyond a possibility of doubt, but the circumstances must be such as to establish a reasonable assurance of the identity of the specimen although all possibility of tampering is not excluded.”
• violation of V.R.Cr.P. 16 cured where identity of witness becomes known to the defendant during trial and the court orders the State to produce him, thereby giving the defendant an opportunity to depose the witness or examine him on the stand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).