Mobbs v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rulings on similarity of accidents he within trial court’s discretion
• explaining a distinction between the use of the term “consolidation” in federal and Vermont practice
• discussing V.R.C.P 42 and distinguishing a court order to hold a joint trial from an order merging “suits in a single cause of action”
• discussing V.R.C.P. 42 and distinguishing a court order to hold a joint trial from an order merging “suits in a single cause of action”
• trial court did not abuse discretion in refusing to allow testimony of accidents at railroad crossings other than site of accident
• trial court's use of indefinite article \correctly and unambiguously\ informed jurors that more than one proximate cause is possible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).