State v. Shannon

Citations

• 163 N.E.3d 1180
• 2020 Ohio 5511

Syllabus

R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record contrary to law R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) imposition of consecutive sentences commission of new offenses while on judicial release R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(a) conduct R.C. 2953.08(D)(1) agreed sentence H.B. 49 R.C. 2929.34(B)(3)(c)-(d). Imposition of consecutive prison sentences was not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record or contrary to law. Trial court was not limited to consideration of the facts associated with the specific offenses to which defendant pled guilty in determining whether consecutive sentences were warranted. \Spirit\ of H.B. 49 did not preclude trial court from imposing consecutive prison sentences where defendant agreed to a prison sentence as a condition of plea agreement and offenses to which defendant pled guilty included drug trafficking offenses. R.C. 2929.24(C) had no application to the fourth- and fifth-degree felonies to which defendant pled guilty.