State v. Delmonico

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 3368

Syllabus

Sufficiency of the evidence manifest weight of the evidence R.C. 2913.02(A)(2) theft elderly person exceed scope of consent intent to deprive minimal performance. The state presented evidence which, if believed, was sufficient to show that the defendant-appellant knowingly acted with purpose to deprive his clients of their money by exerting control over such property beyond the scope of the owners' express or implied consent and in violation of R.C. 2913.02(A)(2). The verdict was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the evidence introduced at trial supported the conclusion that defendant-appellant intended to deprive the victims of their money when their contracts were entered, in violation of R.C. 2913.02(A)(2). The trial court did not err when it sentenced the defendant-appellant to consecutive sentences because the imposition of consecutive sentences comported with the requirements of R.C. 2929.14(C)(4).