Skip to main content

State v. Huffman

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 1192

Syllabus

Agreed sentence plea agreement accept reject expressly concurrent consecutive recommended sentence due process. Appellant's sentence was vacated, and the case was remanded for the trial court to resentence appellant under the plea agreement or to allow appellant to withdraw his guilty plea. Agreed sentences are distinct from recommended sentences. Where a plea agreement includes an agreed sentence, it is incumbent upon the trial court to expressly accept or reject that agreement. Moreover, due process requires the trial court to put the defendant on notice of the possibility that it could impose a longer prison term than negotiated under a plea agreement before accepting a guilty plea. Because no appeal was taken in a separate case for which a joint sentencing hearing was held, any challenge to the imposition of consecutive sentences in that case could not be addressed.

Judges: Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.