State v. Black
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 188
Syllabus
Guilty plea knowing voluntary intelligent prejudice consecutive sentences R.C. 2929.14(C) R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12 consideration. Defendant cannot demonstrate that he would not have entered the plea had the trial court's advisement regarding the sex offender registration requirements lacked substantial compliance because he was already subjected to the highest tier of reporting requirements. The consecutive sentence findings were supported by the record, and the record demonstrates that the trial court considered all the factors required by law.
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 654×
- State v. ClintonOhio Supreme Court· 2017-12-19· cited 273×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-10· cited 90×
- State v. NaveOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-31· cited 7×
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-22· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.