Supreme Court of Connecticut· 9/5/2006
State v. Scruggs
Citations
- 905 A.2d 24
- 279 Conn. 698
- 2006 Conn. LEXIS 315
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘‘[r]eferences to judicial opinions involving the statute, the common law, legal dictionaries, or treatises may be necessary to ascertain a statute’s meaning to determine if it gives fair warning’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- under claim of insufficient evidence, ‘‘in order for any appellate theory to withstand scrutiny . . . it must be shown to be not merely before the jury due to an incidental reference, but as part of a coherent theory of guilt’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Borden, Lavery, Palmer, Sullivan, Vertefeuille
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-15· cited 86×
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-01-26· cited 64×
- Kaczynski v. KaczynskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-11-10· cited 35×
- State v. SkiddConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-09-25· cited 28×
- State v. Maurice M.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-11-29· cited 23×
- State v. Lamont FieldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-08-30· cited 19×
- State v. CLIFTON OWENSConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-04-17· cited 15×
- State v. James E.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2017-12-12· cited 13×
- State v. AdgersConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-05-08· cited 10×
- State v. Michael T.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2019-12-03· cited 10×
- State v. MAURICE M.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-07-28· cited 7×
- State v. AziegbemiConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-11-18· cited 7×
- State v. LEGRANDConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-06-07· cited 5×
- Klein v. Norwalk HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-04-21· cited 3×
- State v. Hector M.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-02-25· cited 3×
- State v. Charles L.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2023-01-24· cited 3×
- State v. Stephen G.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-04-14· cited 2×
- State v. AliceaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-06-23· cited 2×
- State v. MansfieldConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-05-03· cited 1×
- State v. Jodi D.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-08-31· cited 1×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,335×
- Doyle v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory ServicesTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2000-05-03· cited 177×
- State v. PaduaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-03-29· cited 162×
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-06· cited 102×
- State v. SchriverSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-05-17· cited 97×
- Larobina v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-07-12· cited 87×
- State v. RomeroSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-08· cited 84×
- State v. SorabellaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-02-07· cited 79×
- State v. CavalloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-05· cited 65×
- State v. McClarySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-26· cited 60×
- State v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-07-29· cited 60×
- Neil R. Cola v. Charles H. Reardon, Sheriff of Essex CountyFirst Circuit· 1986-03-26· cited 53×
- State v. Robert H.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-03-08· cited 41×
- Graff v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-04-11· cited 39×
- State v. VelezConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-12-13· cited 27×
- State v. PalangioConnecticut Appellate Court· 1991-03-26· cited 26×
- State v. TorriceConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-09-19· cited 25×
- In the Interest of D. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-03-17· cited 20×
- State v. GuitardConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-01-30· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.