Supreme Court of Connecticut· 5/6/1997

State v. Payne

Citations

240 Conn. 766
695 A.2d 525
1997 Conn. LEXIS 127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

implying that facial challenge is appropriate when fundamental right is implicated
implying in dicta that facial challenge is appropriate when any fundamental constitutional right is challenged on vagueness grounds
leaving seventeen month old child unattended in apartment created situation risking injury to child's life or limb
rejecting due process claim when “defendant has made no plausible argument, nor can we conceive of one, that he acted in reliance on the belief that his conduct was lawful, or that a person of ordinary intelligence would have no reason to know that he was engaging in prohibited conduct”
defendant convicted of coercion after forcing three children under threat of death to urinate into cup
because “health” means state of being hale, sound or whole in body, mind or well-being, mental health encompassed by legislature’s use of term in § 53-21

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berdon, Norcott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.