Skip to main content

State v. Courchesne

Citations

  • 998 A.2d 1
  • 296 Conn. 622
  • 2010 Conn. LEXIS 227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting claim that death sentence was arbitrary for ‘‘the same essential reasons that we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to support the imposition of the death penalty under our capital sentencing scheme’’
  • “limitations on ex post facto judicial decisionmaking are inherent in the notion of due process” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • \it is axiomatic that 'those who promulgate statutes ... do not intend ... absurd consequences or bizarre results' \
  • ‘‘it is axiomatic that ‘those who promulgate statutes . . . do not intend . . . absurd consequences or bizarre results’ ’’
  • \a statute is not unconstitutional merely because it is ambiguous or requires further investigation\
  • “it is axiomatic that those who promulgate statutes ... do not intend to promulgate statutes . . . that lead to absurd consequences or bizarre results” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zarella, Rogers, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zareila, Schaller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

278 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.