Tennessee Supreme Court· 8/25/2004

State v. Davis

Citations

141 S.W.3d 600
2004 Tenn. LEXIS 663
2004 WL 1888299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that a defendant in a criminal case may not proceed pro se while simultaneously being represented by counsel
stating that “if an individual is not brought before a magistrate within 72 hours, there has been “unnecessary delay[]’” (quoting Huddleston, 924 S.W.2d at 670)
adopting the Court of Criminal Appeals’ conclusion affirming the admission of autopsy reports as business records under Rule 803(6) and public records under 803(8)
adopting the Court of Criminal Appeals’ analysis and conclusions upholding the admission of autopsy reports as public documents under Rules 803(6) and 803(8)
adopting the Court of Criminal Appeals’ analysis and conclusions upholding the admission of autopsy reports as public documents under Rule 803(6) and 803(8)
during robbery, 18-year-old male defendant actively involved in shooting two victims in head

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice E. Riley Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.