Hawaii Supreme Court· 5/11/2012

State v. Schnabel.

Citations

127 Haw. 432
279 P.3d 1237
2012 WL 1981217
2012 Haw. LEXIS 153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the trial court's error in admitting evidence infringed on the defendant's right to testify, where defense counsel stated on the record that the defendant had decided not to testify based in part on the court's ruling
“it is universally accepted that a court must judicially notice the public law of its own jurisdiction” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
“it is universally accepted that a court must judicially notice the public law of its own jurisdiction” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
it was prosecutorial misconduct to tell the jury to ignore the “mumbo jumbo” of the jury instructions and go with their “gut feeling”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Acoba, Duffy, Mekenna, Recktenwald, Nakayama

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

103 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.