Hawaii Supreme Court· 2/26/2014

State v. Davis.

Citations

133 Haw. 102
324 P.3d 912
2014 WL 747422
2014 Haw. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that double jeopardy clause of Hawai#i Constitution requires addressing defendant's claim of insufficiency of the evidence before remanding for new trial based on defective charge
concluding that evidence of matching name, date of birth, and last four digits of social security number was sufficient to show that the defendant was the previously convicted individual
holding that the double 6 ** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER ** jeopardy clause of Article I, Section 10 of the Hawaiʻi Constitution requires an appellate court to address a defendant’s express claim of insufficiency of the evidence before remanding
noting that even where the appellate court finds trial error, “challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence must always be decided on appeal” or retrial would raise double jeopardy concerns (citation omitted)
requiring review of an evidentiary sufficiency challenge before remanding for a new trial based on trial error
requiring review of an evidentiary sufficiency challenge before remanding for a new trial based on trial error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Acoba, McKENNA, Nakayama, Pollack, Recktenwald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.