State v. Moriwake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in certain circumstances, “the preclusion of a second” trial would be appropriate
• stating that the State’s interests must be balanced against fundamental fairness to the defendant and the orderly functioning of the courts
• noting that the “inherent power of the court is ... the power to administer justice”
• determining that the (continued . . .) 13 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** B. Michaeledes’s Points of Error Lack Merit On appeal, Michaeledes argues: (1
• finding trial court has inherent authority to dismiss indictment after mistrials caused by hung jury
• stating that \the inherent power of the court is the power to protect itself; the power to administer justice whether any previous form of remedy has been granted or not; the power to promulgate rules for its practice; and the power to provide process where none exists\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).