Skip to main content

State v. Acker.

Citations

  • 133 Haw. 253
  • 327 P.3d 931
  • 2014 WL 594334
  • 2014 Haw. LEXIS 83

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that prior incidents where defendants also robbed lone men, left them at remote locations, and escaped in their victims’ vehicles were admissible to show common plan and lack of coercion
  • “[T]he record is clear that [the witness] would not have produced ‘relevant and material testimony befitting the defense’ because he refused to testify.”
  • \[A] jury is presumed to follow the instructions it is given by the court.\
  • \It is well settled that one who is charged as a principal can be convicted as an accomplice without accomplice allegations being made in the indictment.\ (emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Recktenwald, Nakayama, Nacino, Pollack, Acoba, McKenna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.