Hawaii Supreme Court· 2/14/2014
State v. Acker.
Citations
- 133 Haw. 253
- 327 P.3d 931
- 2014 WL 594334
- 2014 Haw. LEXIS 83
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that prior incidents where defendants also robbed lone men, left them at remote locations, and escaped in their victims’ vehicles were admissible to show common plan and lack of coercion
- “[T]he record is clear that [the witness] would not have produced ‘relevant and material testimony befitting the defense’ because he refused to testify.”
- \[A] jury is presumed to follow the instructions it is given by the court.\
- \It is well settled that one who is charged as a principal can be convicted as an accomplice without accomplice allegations being made in the indictment.\ (emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Recktenwald, Nakayama, Nacino, Pollack, Acoba, McKenna
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. Abion.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2020-12-29· cited 10×
- State v. Feliciano.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2021-06-29· cited 9×
- State v. Gallagher.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2020-05-15· cited 8×
- State v. Williander.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2018-04-04· cited 7×
- State v. HilarioHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2017-04-19· cited 1×
- State v. TomaHawaii Supreme Court· 2015-12-21
- State v. McFeeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2020-05-29
- State v. Rosa.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2020-08-31
- State v. FelicianoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2020-08-31
- State v. DavidHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2020-09-30
- State v. RiveiraHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2020-12-11
- State v. Ngalu, Jr.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2021-03-09
- State v. BrainHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2018-12-06
- State v. LauvaoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2022-09-09
- State v. AlongiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2022-10-07
- State v. PulliamHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2024-01-26
- State v. Del RosarioHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2024-03-14
- State v. PokipalaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2024-03-25
- State v. SorensenHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2025-04-30
- State v. BrownHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2025-04-30
Cites
75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 2,329×
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 1,404×
- State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 364×
- Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways CommissionSupreme Court· 1991-12-16· cited 335×
- United States v. ElliottFifth Circuit· 1978-04-21· cited 305×
- United States v. BashamFourth Circuit· 2009-03-30· cited 220×
- United States v. SomersThird Circuit· 1974-03-27· cited 197×
- State v. RoganHawaii Supreme Court· 1999-10-05· cited 183×
- State v. NicholsHawaii Supreme Court· 2006-08-25· cited 164×
- State v. SawyerHawaii Supreme Court· 1998-10-15· cited 150×
- United States v. KennyThird Circuit· 1972-05-22· cited 145×
- State v. ClarkHawaii Supreme Court· 1996-10-03· cited 141×
- State v. FukusakuHawaii Supreme Court· 1997-10-16· cited 132×
- United States v. Rayful Edmond, IIID.C. Circuit· 1995-07-19· cited 128×
- State v. FurutaniHawaii Supreme Court· 1994-04-27· cited 125×
- State v. EstradaHawaii Supreme Court· 1987-06-08· cited 106×
- United States v. Richard B. LankfordEleventh Circuit· 1992-03-25· cited 96×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.