State v. Rivard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “And he is not entitled to have his right restored because he has been convicted of a crime which is classified as a class A felony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rivard v. State
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-05-06· cited 41×
• State v. Hunter
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-10-20· cited 5×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Schmidt
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-05-17· cited 61×
• State v. Reed
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-01-03· cited 42×
• State v. Watkins
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-01-23· cited 30×
• State v. Krzeszowski
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-11· cited 23×
• State v. Schmidt
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-04-14· cited 14×