Skip to main content

State v. Peters

Citations

  • 622 N.W.2d 918
  • 261 Neb. 416
  • 2001 Neb. LEXIS 53

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that such amendments are generally not viewed as further punishment for the underlying felony, but as a proscription on a felon’s future conduct
  • concluding that Davis was not persuasive
  • upholding statute against allegation that law prohibiting felons from possessing firearms constituted ex post facto law, the court said, “Davis is neither persuasive nor applicable....”
  • upholding statute against allegation that law prohibiting felons from possessing firearms constituted ex post facto law, the court said, \ Davis is neither persuasive nor applicable....\
  • it does not follow that compliance with the legislatively imposed time limit will in every instance result in a valid search
  • even though search warrant was executed five days after it was issued, no constitutional violation occurred because the probable cause upon which the warrant was based still existed at the time of execution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendry, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, Miller-Lerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.