Washington Supreme Court· 1/6/1983

State v. Holland

Citations

656 P.2d 1056
98 Wash. 2d 507
1983 Wash. LEXIS 1337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

defendant may not challenge the impeachment use of prior statements on the ground that they were made following an invalid waiver of the privilege against self-incrimination
list of factors a juvenile court should consider before waiving jurisdiction
factors to consider when determining whether to waive juvenile jurisdiction
factors to consider when determining whether to waive juvenile jurisdiction
list of factors a juvenile court should consider before waiving jurisdiction
our Supreme Court was “convinced” that the trial court’s decision to decline juvenile jurisdiction was proper, even though the written findings were inadequate, because “the trial court delivered a carefully reasoned oral opinion which explained more fully [its] decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.