Withrow v. Larkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “a biased decisionmaker [is] constitutionally unacceptable”
• “observing that “a biased decisionmaker [is] constitutionally unacceptable” ”
• stating that “a biased decisionmaker [is] constitutionally unacceptable”
• noting the \presumption of honesty and integrity in those serving as adjudicators\
• noting “a presumption of honesty and integrity in those serving as adjudicators”
• noting “that the probability of actual bias on the part of the judge is too high to be constitutionally tolerable” in cases where “the adjudicator has a pecuniary interest in the outcome and in which he has been the target of personal abuse or criticism from the party before him”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).