Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/28/2010
State v. Sauceda
Citations
- 239 P.3d 996
- 236 Or. App. 358
- 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 882
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to reach unpreserved merger claim where “the trial court will have an opportunity to address that issue in the first instance” on remand for resentencing under ORS 138.222(5)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollheim, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Sercombe, Judge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Sheikh-NurCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-05-17· cited 19×
- State v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-19· cited 8×
- State v. JayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-15· cited 7×
- State v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-12· cited 3×
- State v. RennerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-13· cited 1×
- State v. VineyardCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-01-19
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 504×
- State v. FultsOregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-13· cited 218×
- State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court· 2006-11-09· cited 66×
- State v. SumerlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-03-20· cited 44×
- State v. Valladares-JuarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-07· cited 36×
- State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-06-09· cited 24×
- State v. LEPIERRECourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-06-02· cited 10×
- State v. BowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-03-17· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.