State v. Sheikh-Nur

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 38 C.F.R. § 3.105(d) \clearly contemplat[es] the consideration of evidence acquired after the original granting of service connection\
• differentiating between paragraphs (a) and (d) of § 3.105 and quoting Venturella v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 340, 342-43 (1997) (Steinberg, J., concurring)
• “[T]his Court is precluded from awarding benefits on the basis of equitable estoppel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).