Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/17/2010
State v. Bowers
Citations
- 227 P.3d 822
- 234 Or. App. 301
- 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 266
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- adhering to Summerlin and holding that failure to merge convictions was appealable under ORS 138.050(1)
- rejecting request to limit the holding in Sumerlin; reasoning that “[a] disposition that includes three convictions where it should only include one conviction contains a disposition that exceeds the maximum allowable by law”
- “[T]he time to address a merger claim is post-verdict, not at or before a plea hearing, or during trial.”
- claim that convictions should merge constitutes contention that disposition exceeds maximum allowable by law under ORS 138.050 and is preserved when raised at time of sentencing
- trial court incorrectly concluded that “the requirements of ORS 161.067(3) were not met but that it was only the ‘sentences’ that merged, not the ‘convictions’” and entered separate convictions with concurrent sentences
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollheim, Brewer, Breithaupt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-10· cited 14×
- State v. SaucedaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-07-28· cited 8×
- State v. LandahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-12· cited 7×
- State v. SalvadorCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-09-29· cited 6×
- State v. StantonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-15· cited 3×
- State v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-08
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 428×
- State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court· 2006-11-09· cited 66×
- State v. SumerlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-03-20· cited 44×
- State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-06-09· cited 24×
- Kinross Copper Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-05-19· cited 15×
- State v. EastonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-01-25· cited 15×
- State v. MUYINGOCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-03-04· cited 7×
- State v. Davis/HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-08-04· cited 6×
- State v. Davis/HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-01-12· cited 5×
- State v. MUYINGOOregon Supreme Court· 2009-07-09· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.