State v. Norris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in impos- ing consecutive sentences based on ORS 137.123(5)(a) and noting that the trial court could address ORS 137.123(5)(b) during resentencing
• “We decline to exercise our discretion to address [the] defendant’s unpreserved merger claim. The trial court may resolve that issue on remand.”
• “Because the record lacks any discrete facts evincing defendant’s will- ingness to commit more than one criminal offense, the trial court erred in relying on ORS 137.123(5)(a) to impose a con- secutive term of imprisonment for Counts 2 and 3.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Edwards
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-07· cited 9×
• State v. Sanchez-Chavez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-06-30· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Warren
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-31· cited 19×
• State v. Traylor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-17· cited 14×
• State v. Rojas-Montalvo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-04-01· cited 11×
• State v. Sauceda
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-07-28· cited 8×