Court of Appeals of Washington· 2/7/2005
State v. McInally
Citations
- 106 P.3d 794
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The State is entitled to argue any grounds to affirm the court’s decision that are supported by the record, and is not required to cross-appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schindler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court· 2011-05-05· cited 65×
- City of Spokane v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-10-13· cited 10×
- Department of Social & Health Services v. ZamoraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2017-03-06· cited 10×
- Zellmer v. ZellmerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-05-01· cited 3×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LordWashington Supreme Court· 1992-02-07· cited 447×
- Badgett v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court· 1991-03-28· cited 213×
- State v. SledgeWashington Supreme Court· 1997-12-11· cited 170×
- State v. BobicWashington Supreme Court· 2000-04-06· cited 154×
- State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court· 1988-05-26· cited 139×
- Kramarevcky v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court· 1993-12-02· cited 118×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of JamesWashington Supreme Court· 1982-01-15· cited 80×
- State v. SanchezWashington Supreme Court· 2002-05-09· cited 34×
- State v. OnefreyWashington Supreme Court· 1992-09-03· cited 29×
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-06-01· cited 22×
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-08-10· cited 19×
- State v. ShinemanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-02-05· cited 17×
- State v. McInallyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-01-24· cited 15×
- In Re the Arbitration of Doyle & Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-11-20· cited 14×
- State v. GossCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-01-08· cited 13×
- State v. McRaeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-07-16· cited 9×
- Bavarian Properties, Ltd. v. RossWashington Supreme Court· 1985-06-13· cited 8×
- Hadaller v. Port of ChehalisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-10-29· cited 8×
- Smoke v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-09-25· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.