Skip to main content

State v. Sanchez

Citations

  • 670 A.2d 535
  • 143 N.J. 273
  • 1996 N.J. LEXIS 8

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when the codefendants’ proffered testimony is likely to be significantly exculpatory, denying the defendant’s severance motion could be highly prejudicial to the defendant, and potentially could lead to the conviction of an innocent person
  • holding a joint trial is preferred where the State's evidence against the defendants is common
  • “few rights are more fundamental that that of an accused – to present witnesses in his own defense”
  • “few rights are more fundamental that that of an accused – to present witnesses in his own defense”
  • \[F]ew rights are more fundamental than that of an accused to present witnesses in his own defense.\ (quoting Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 302 (1973))
  • “ ‘[F]ew rights are more fundamental than that of an accused to present witnesses in his own defense.’” (quoting Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 302, 93 S.Ct. 1038, 1049, 35 L.Ed.2d 297, 312 (1973))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.