Supreme Court of New Jersey· 12/3/2001

State v. Brown

Citations

784 A.2d 1244
170 N.J. 138
2001 N.J. LEXIS 1409

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the government had not adopted the statements of an informant submitted in a sworn affidavit in support of a search warrant submitted before the defendant’s indictment
noting that “an informant’s hearsay statements can be used to determine whether probable cause exists in the Fourth Amendment context”
holding \jury was able to consider the co-defendant's guilt separately from defendant because it convicted them of different crimes.\
stating that \New Jersey has expressly declined to adopt the federal residual hearsay exception\
stating that “New Jersey has expressly declined to adopt the federal residual hearsay exception”
upholding a trial court's denial of a request to disclose the CI's identity, where the CI made controlled buys, which the State used as the basis for a search warrant application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman, Stein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.