· 6/1/2012
In Re Pelvic mesh/gynecare Lit.
Citations
- 43 A.3d 1211
- 426 N.J. Super. 167
- 2012 WL 1957932
- 2012 N.J. Super. LEXIS 88
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that if the Court intended to adopt a new rule of law it would do so directly
- reversing pretrial order barring the defendants from retaining as experts in pelvic mesh litigation any physicians who treated the plaintiffs
- reversing pretrial order barring the defendants from retaining as experts in pelvic mesh litigation any physicians who treated the plaintiffs
- reversing pretrial order barring the defendants from retaining as experts in pelvic mesh litigation any physicians who treated the plaintiffs
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges A.A. Rodrãguez, Sabatino and Ashrafi
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.