New Mexico Supreme Court· 7/26/1995
State v. Sanchez
Citations
- 901 P.2d 178
- 120 N.M. 247
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a juror who was an employee of the state’s attorney was impliedly biased
- concluding that a 3 juror who was an employee of the state’s attorney was impliedly biased
- stating that within the context of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, this Court will not second guess the tactics or strategy of defense counsel
- stating that within the context of an ineffective assistance of counsel 16 claim, the appellate courts presume counsel is competent and will not second guess 17 the tactics or strategy of defense counsel
- discussing a claim of juror bias and determining that, absent exceptional circumstances justifying a finding of implied bias, a defendant must demonstrate actual bias
- discussing a claim of juror bias and determining that, absent 14 exceptional circumstances justifying a finding of implied bias, a defendant must 15 demonstrate actual bias
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Minzner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RojoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1998-12-03· cited 1,163×
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-02-15· cited 266×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-11-13· cited 197×
- State v. HesterNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-04-12· cited 113×
- State v. FryNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-12-08· cited 103×
- State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-01-23· cited 72×
- State v. MannNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2002-01-11· cited 60×
- State v. StefaniNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-05-02· cited 53×
- State v. StefaniNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-06-29· cited 46×
- State v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-07-30· cited 26×
- State v. RiveraNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-09-17· cited 23×
- State v. NapulouHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1997-04-09· cited 23×
- State v. BoikoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-04-26· cited 20×
- State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2005-10-06· cited 19×
- State v. SloanNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2019-10-31· cited 18×
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2023-07-06· cited 13×
- State v. ArchuletaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-11-07· cited 8×
- State v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2017-03-14· cited 8×
- State v. VanderdussenNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2018-04-05· cited 8×
- State v. WidmerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2020-09-15· cited 6×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 3,512×
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-01-14· cited 192×
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1992-02-06· cited 157×
- United States v. Nestor Uribe, United States of America v. Leon Alberior Rave-Arias, United States of America v. David RashFirst Circuit· 1989-12-04· cited 109×
- State v. JettNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-02-04· cited 69×
- State v. RichardsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-10-07· cited 49×
- United States v. Oscar Diaz-AlbertiniTenth Circuit· 1985-09-10· cited 46×
- State v. PerezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-12-31· cited 46×
- Haak v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-03-10· cited 37×
- State v. GriffinNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-06-02· cited 30×
- Randolph v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1986-09-25· cited 28×
- State v. SacomanNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1988-09-27· cited 25×
- State v. BojorquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-06-11· cited 13×
- State v. McGoughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-01-13· cited 9×
- State v. MaconMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-01-26· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.