State v. Sacoman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of defendant’s distribution of cocaine was properly admitted when defendant claimed that he was only on the periphery of drug activities because “[i]t is proper for the State to correct a false impression generated by the defendant”
• holding that all evidence must be “screened through the judicial process”
• holding that all evidence must be \screened through the judicial process\
• stating that extraneous information improperly considered during deliberations creates a presumption of prejudice
• “It is proper for the State to correct a false impression generated by the defendant.”
• extraneous information created a presumption of prejudice that the trial court reasonably found to have been overcome

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).