State v. Sanchez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• challenge to failure to establish interpreter qualifications is not within scope of review under ORS 138.222(4)(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Buffum
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-04-19· cited 25×
• State v. Stubbs
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-06-09· cited 24×
• State v. Arnold
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-07-25· cited 13×
• State v. Lavitsky
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-20· cited 9×
• State v. Clements
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-20· cited 6×
• State v. Ross
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-04-13· cited 5×
• State v. Lebeck
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-27· cited 5×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Pablo Mayans
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-02-09· cited 200×
• United States of America Ex Rel. Rogelio Nieves Negron v. The State of New York
  Second Circuit· 1970-10-15· cited 173×
• State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. Sawyer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-02-21· cited 171×
• Orleans Parish School Board v. United States Gypsum Co.
  Supreme Court· 1997-12-01· cited 101×
• State v. Adams
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 83×
• Sawyer v. Oregon ex rel. Huddleston
  Supreme Court· 1997-12-01· cited 78×
• State v. Kephart
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-12-16· cited 54×
• Stelts v. State of Oregon
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-06-18· cited 40×
• State v. Cook
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-09-04· cited 22×
• State v. Henderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-12-02· cited 12×
• State v. Henderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-11-03· cited 11×
• State v. Fern
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-11· cited 10×
• State v. Nghia Gia Dam
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-01-22· cited 9×
• State v. Daniel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-09-09· cited 6×
• Castro v. Maass
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-02-07· cited 4×