United States v. Pablo Mayans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that completion of entire sentence moots habeas appeal, 18 but appeal from a petitioner on supervised release is not mooted because success “could alter the 19 supervised release portion of [the] sentence”
• stating the last element of the four-part test as “(4) (in cases where knowledge and intent are at issue) the act is similar to the offense charged” (citation omitted)
• stating the last element of the four-part test as “(4) (in cases where knowledge and intent are at issue) the act is similar to the offense charged” (citation omitted)
• ”[i]n cases where knowledge and intent are at issue ... the act [must be] similar to the offense charged.”
• “[The] fundamental question of whether an interpreter is necessary has been consigned to the wide discretion of the trial court.” (quotation omitted)
• “While a prosecutor may not draw attention to a defendant’s silence, prosecutors are entitled to call attention to the defendant’s failure to present exculpatory evidence more generally.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).